Equipment Appraisal Blog | Understanding Machinery Appraisals

The need to have an independent machinery and equipment (M&E) appraisal completed for your business can arise from any number of circumstances. The most common reasons are for collateral review with bank financing and leasing, merger and acquisition, purchase or sale, estate planning or settlement, divorces and business disputes, insurance, accounting, and tax requirements.

In all of these instances, Fair Market Value is estimated and deemed appropriate to rely upon; however, there may be reasons to consider lower-value premises such as Orderly and Forced Liquidation (Auction). Many finance companies and investors, as well as those not used to buying and selling equipment for a living, like to understand these lower-tier value levels given the likelihood they may not realize Fair Market Value in a real-world scenario.

Similar to estimating Fair Market Value, the appraiser will utilize available resale market data and consider factors such as replacement cost, useful life, depreciation, and other relevant components in their methodology. There are auction databases and other sources of information that can be found when researching liquidation values. Of note, auctions can tend to have inconsistent results with their sales depending on a variety of factors that determine the level of success a particular venue may have.

Given the appraiser will most likely be estimating Fair Market Value as part of their analysis, will they want to go back to the market and start over again with a liquidation assessment? Probably not. Instead, there are a couple of options where the valuation professional can establish reasonable liquidation value estimates utilizing Fair Market Value as a starting point.

One of these is to review databases and obtain opinions from market resellers regarding the average variance between the wholesale and retail markets. Databases involving vehicles and construction equipment, as an example, include this type of analysis estimating these different levels of value.

Depending on the level of resale activity for a particular type of equipment, you will see higher or lower margins between the fair market and liquidation value. Generally, the more active the market, the less differential you will see compared with equipment in a more specialized industry.

The value level of the M&E may also play a part in establishing a reasonable differential. A $500,000 piece of equipment may have a lower percentage margin than a $5,000 asset given what a reseller would try to target for a dollar profit margin between his wholesale price and the end user price. Similar to how an appraiser establishes Fair Market Value, they seek to rely on these variables to develop a pattern that makes sense when estimating liquidation value.

One of the most common documents an equipment appraiser will receive from their clients during the early stage of the valuation process is an asset depreciation report, which tracks all the capitalized machinery, FF&E, real property, and improvements that a company has invested in and acquired over time. This document can be useful in the valuation process; however, it is generally not reliable on its own.

The capitalized depreciation record will usually be categorized and itemized by type of asset and includes the date of acquisition, dollar amount, and a brief description of the item. There will also be columns for accounting information so the company can internally track depreciation while providing a helpful tool for property tax and balance sheet purposes.

From an appraisal perspective, the original acquisition dates and associated investment amounts are the most beneficial pieces of information, however, with the descriptions typically abbreviated, it will be difficult to rely on the document to create an accurate itemized listing for the purposes of researching values. These documents can also be incomplete or include equipment that has long been disposed of. This is because companies will expense a portion of their equipment purchases while not having a consistent process in place for updating the report for accuracy.

It is important the appraiser and client review this listing together with the goal of expanding the descriptions while adding items that are not on the list and excluding those that should be removed.

For example, old computer equipment might have been sold or scrapped years ago for newer models but remain on the list, or there may be $10,000 worth of hand tools that were expensed over the years and never capitalized and depreciated.

The goal in any M&E appraisal is to create a refined list that is reasonably accurate and complete so the valuation process will be supportable. The primary focus can be on the larger, more valuable equipment while potentially grouping smaller asset types like office equipment and support tools so the process doesn’t get too bogged down and time-consuming.

In summary, when you provide an asset depreciation schedule as part of the data requested by the appraiser, anticipate the need to get more involved to afford them a better understanding of the detail behind it so they can develop a more accurate listing that represents your company’s machinery and equipment.

Simply put, the better the data provided, the better the result will be with the valuation. Discuss this topic with your appraiser proactively to ensure a timely and effective process.

Even though other professional appraisers may disagree with me on this topic, I find it is relevant to raise the issue of whether the income approach should apply or even be a consideration when valuing most machinery and equipment (M&E). In my 40 years of working in the M&E asset management and valuation markets, involving machinery across virtually every known industry, I can count on one hand how many times I have even attempted to assess and place weight on this approach. The same goes for the number of times I have been asked by a client even to consider it.

In layman's terms, the Income Approach estimates the current value of the future economic benefits of owning a particular piece of equipment. Similar to using this approach to estimate the value of a complete business or real property (land, buildings, and related assets), which is relevant in many cases, it requires the ability to clearly separate and directly apply revenue and expenses to M&E.

A scenario where this might be possible is a business that owns a rental fleet of equipment such as trucks, trailers, or heavy machinery. Both short- and long-term rental history could be considered and potentially applied to estimate the value of this type of activity. There are concerns, however, as to the validity and reliance of the assessment.

First, it is common practice in the equipment rental industry to apply discounts to the eventual purchase price of these assets based on past rentals when their clients eventually want to buy them outright. Even with large assets such as aircraft, this is not unusual. The result is that a significant portion of rental income lessens the real market value of the equipment, causing it to get tangled up with the other approaches to value.

Second, assuming you can estimate value under the Income Approach, given the restrictions and requirements, how do you weigh the result in the context of the other approaches, namely Cost and Sales Comparison (Market)?

You cannot completely ignore the other two approaches, as they should be considered and applied to some degree in every equipment appraisal regardless of the purpose, especially if the income approach estimate is materially different from that of the cost and market methodologies. I have never completed an M&E valuation without placing weight on each of these two methods.

In summary, these are just two of several issues that create concerns about the appropriateness of utilizing the income approach to assess M&E value. Contact an accredited professional appraiser to learn more on the topic.

Machinery & Equipment (M&E) valuation relies in large part on understanding the new and used trade markets and developing an analysis that reasonably reflects what the particular assets being appraised would be worth in those markets. Another important component of an M&E appraisal is looking internally at the business that is or was directly involved with the most recent purchase and operation history of the equipment to understand the facts behind this.

The additional perspective an appraiser receives by learning this history is critical to making potential adjustments to the market information they research. This history provides in-depth specifics for the machinery actually being valued that can’t be disputed. Every piece of equipment is unique in its own way. There may be somewhat different specifications between the assets being valued and what is available as a comparison in the market. Materially different hours or mileage may become a factor to consider as well as any recent upgrades or refurbishments completed.

Knowing the original purchase price of the machinery, even if it was acquired several years ago, will assist in reasonably verifying that the replacement cost estimates you determine are accurate. Appraisers cannot blindly assume all the independent market information they uncover is 100% bulletproof, as sources can be limited in their ability to provide all the right answers. This is perhaps the biggest challenge in the equipment industry. Unlike business valuation, where databases and historical financial data are almost always available, or real estate, which has a tendency to provide a wide array of published comparable property resale data, the machinery markets can behave in very inconsistent ways.

You will commonly see the same makes and models of equipment, with virtually identical specifications and usage, listing and selling for vastly different prices. The auction marketplace, which reflects billions of dollars of used equipment sales annually, experiences varying levels of demand, any of which may play a part in developing values for many types of assets. With the recent growth in online auctions across these markets, these disparities can be even more pronounced.

In summary, the historical data you can provide to an appraiser that complements their independent research and analysis will be very helpful in ultimately determining a reasonable and supportable value for your M&E.

At the lowest end of the machinery and equipment valuation spectrum are two concepts tied together by the mere fact that they estimate value at the end of an asset’s life: Salvage Value and Scrap Value. You might think they mean basically the same thing, however, there are distinct differences between them which are important to understand.

When a piece of equipment reaches the end of its useful life, the owner has options with which to determine the disposition of the machine. Does it make sense to reinvest capital to replace major components and refurbish the asset or is the additional money needed too high in comparison to replacing it with a newer one? If the decision is to purchase new and retire the older model unit, then the discussion of salvage and scrap value comes into play.

Assuming there remain a number of useful parts or components that can be resold with the machine or removed and sold separately, then salvage value can be estimated by reviewing what remains and adding it all up. If the machine is beyond this stage, where excessive usage over time has left nothing to salvage but the weight of the metal, rubber, and plastic, then scrap value is the only viable option.

In both instances, you can consider researching local recycling and salvage facilities that will assess the condition and offer a price to purchase the machine in its entirety. As an alternative, you can complete the assessment with the help of a professional appraiser and remarket the assets directly to brokers and third parties who may have a need to stock up on spare parts. Yet another option is to keep the machine on hand and strip the parts off when you need them for other working equipment in your fleet.

Whichever option you choose, it might be a good idea to obtain an overall independent condition assessment from a qualified mechanic or utilize the experience of your in-house maintenance manager to estimate this. Equipment appraisers can assist as well, based on their knowledge of typical salvage and scrap values for many different types of machinery.

From an appraiser’s perspective, developing estimates of salvage value at end-of-life is a common practice when developing annual depreciated value estimates for new equipment. This analysis is also performed by finance and leasing companies with experienced asset management teams as part of their organization.

In summary, understanding asset value at the latter stages of an asset’s life is just as important as in its early days when the machinery is in full operation. You can discuss any of these topics in more detail with an accredited machinery appraiser who is able to assist in the process.